Showing posts with label coca-cola. Show all posts
Showing posts with label coca-cola. Show all posts

Monday, December 26, 2016

Paying for Expert Opinion: Dieticians Paid by Coke to Take Anti-Soda Tax Position


Paying for Expert Opinion: Dietitians Paid by Coke to Take Anti-Soda Tax Position
By Kurtis Bright

Coca-Cola Secretly Pays Low-Life Dietitians to Look the Other Way


Living in a state where a soda tax was on the ballot this last election? If so, did you happen to notice how many registered dietitians came out against the issue on Twitter and in letters to the editor in the weeks running up to November 8?

It has recently come to light that you may have Coca-Cola to thank for that.

Last year we learned that Coca-Cola, the world’s biggest producer of sugary soft drinks is in the habit of paying university researchers and health experts to downplay the dangers of drinking soda and instead try to force the focus onto getting more exercise and never mind about caloric intake. So it should come as no surprise that the corporation was at it again, muddying the waters by using secretly paid “expert opinion” to toe the corporate line on the soda tax issue.

The American Beverage Association--a big soda lobbying group--along with Coca-Cola was found to have--surprise surprise--resorted to sleazy tactics to get their message out.

Many of those dietitians who were “concerned” about the proposed soda taxes on the ballot in California and Boulder, Colorado among other places suddenly turned up on Twitter and in the pages of local newspapers in the weeks just before the election. But it turns out their concern may have been more with their own pocketbook than anything else.

An investigative reporter for Ninjas For Health grew suspicious when these tweets and letters to the editor started rolling out all at once, all of them repeating the industry talking points that a soda tax is a stealth grocery tax (it isn’t) and suggesting that reducing soda intake may not even help make people healthier (it does). The reporter discovered a nest of these sleazy dietitians who turned out to be on the payroll of Coca-Cola--and who are surely planning for a long and cozy afterlife in the darkest corners of hell, where they will be forced to swill gallons of Coke while strapped to chair a la Homer Simpson and the hellish donut machine.

Of course there is nothing illegal about paying people to say things for you, even things that are demonstrably false, and which those paid shills then tweet publicly or send to the letters to the editor section of newspapers.

The tricky part about this group of dietitians is that they have been less than candid about where their money comes from. The tweets they posted were purportedly the opinions of “health experts” who are simply weighing in on a public controversy as concerned public citizens. But as the NFH reporter said, shouldn’t they at least have to listed as “sponsored posts?”

The industry, as usual, has evaded any admission of responsibility for its huge part in the obesity and diabetes crisis. They’ve been trying to walk an ever-narrower line, for instance by using these dietitians to write blog posts downplaying the importance of avoiding sugar without going so far as to actually recommend drinking soda.

A recent AP story illustrated this nicely: when confronted with evidence of its PR campaign disguised as health advice, Coca-Cola acknowledged that they have been “...working with health experts on such social media efforts for several years.” But of course such an admission only came once they’d been caught with their hand in the cookie jar full of paid liars.

If a company finds the need to resort to tricks to promote its position, you can be sure it is a terrible position. Click this link for a list of shame naming the Coca-Cola-sponsored dietitians that have thus far been identified and samples of their posts.
###

Sunday, December 18, 2016

Coca-Cola Secretly Pays Registered Dietitians To Shill For Anti-Soda Tax Position


Coca-Cola Secretly Pays Registered Dietitians To Shill For Anti-Soda Tax Position
By Kurtis Bright
 
Sleazy Soft Drink Tactics: Coca-Cola Secretly Pays Dietitians

Do you live in a state where there was a soda tax on the ballot this last election? If so, did you happen to notice how many registered dietitians came out against the issue on Twitter and in letters to the editor in the weeks running up to November 8?

It has recently come to light that you may have Coca-Cola to thank for that.

Last year we learned that Coca-Cola, the world’s biggest producer of sugary soft drinks is in the habit of paying university researchers and health experts to downplay the dangers of drinking soda and instead try to force the focus onto getting more exercise and never mind about caloric intake. So it should come as no surprise that the corporation was at it again, muddying the waters by using secretly paid “expert opinion” to toe the corporate line on the soda tax issue.

The American Beverage Association--a big soda lobbying group--along with Coca-Cola was found to have--surprise surprise--resorted to sleazy tactics to get their message out.

Many of those dietitians who were “concerned” about the proposed soda taxes on the ballot in California and Boulder, Colorado among other places suddenly turned up on Twitter and in the pages of local newspapers in the weeks just before the election. But it turns out their concern may have been more with their own pocketbook than anything else.

An investigative reporter for Ninjas For Health grew suspicious when these tweets and letters to the editor started rolling out all at once, all of them repeating the industry talking points that a soda tax is a stealth grocery tax (it isn’t) and suggesting that reducing soda intake may not even help make people healthier (it does). The reporter discovered a nest of these sleazy dietitians who turned out to be on the payroll of Coca-Cola--and who are surely planning for a long and cozy afterlife in the darkest corners of hell, where they will be forced to swill gallons of Coke while strapped to chair a la Homer Simpson and the hellish donut machine.


Of course there is nothing illegal about paying people to say things for you, even things that are demonstrably false, and which those paid shills then tweet publicly or send to the letters to the editor section of newspapers.

The tricky part about this group of dietitians is that they have been less than candid about where their money comes from. The tweets they posted were purportedly the opinions of “health experts” who are simply weighing in on a public controversy as concerned public citizens. But as the NFH reporter said, shouldn’t they at least have to listed as “sponsored posts?”

The industry, as usual, has evaded any admission of responsibility for its huge part in the obesity and diabetes crisis. They’ve been trying to walk an ever-narrower line, for instance by using these dietitians to write blog posts downplaying the importance of avoiding sugar without going so far as to actually recommend drinking soda.

A recent AP story illustrated this nicely: when confronted with evidence of its PR campaign disguised as health advice, Coca-Cola acknowledged that they have been “...working with health experts on such social media efforts for several years.” But of course such an admission only came once they’d been caught with their hand in the cookie jar full of paid liars.

If a company finds the need to resort to tricks to promote its position, you can be sure it is a terrible position. Click this link for a list of shame naming the Coca-Cola-sponsored dietitians that have thus far been identified and samples of their posts.
###

Saturday, December 3, 2016

The Bullshitocene Age: Pepsi and Coca-Cola Have Sponsored Nearly 100 Dubious ‘Health’ Organizations


The Bullshitocene Age: Pepsi and Coca-Cola Have Sponsored Nearly 100 Dubious ‘Health’ Organizations
By Kurtis Bright

On Peak PR and Muddying The (Sugar) Water: Coke And Pepsi Sponsored Nearly 100 ‘Health’ Organizations


The earth has survived the Pleistocene Age, the Jurassic Age, and now we are trying our best to end a successful 4 billion year run for the planet with what some are calling the Anthropocene Age, the one that has been distinguished by humans altering the planet.

However, even at peak Anthopocene, we may also be entering a new sub-era right now, if big multinational food and beverage companies have anything to say about it.

Call it the Bullshitocene Age.

Future anthropologists will mark this as the era when bullshit came to the fore to such a degree that there was no longer any reliable means of telling it from the truth.

Presidential politics aside--and yes, there is a bounty of examples of the Bullhistocene Age there--a fine demonstration of how low we’ve sunk comes from a recent study on PepsiCo and Coca-Cola. These two massive multinational food and beverage operations, each of whom has a vested interest in selling sugar water to children, have each invested in nearly a hundred health organizations over the course of five years.

Conveniently for people who make their living selling sugar water, these corporate-funded “health” organizations fought to weaken the fight against obesity.


The research comes out of the University of Boston, and found that, combined, Pepsi and Coke gave money to 96 so-called health organizations between the years 2011 and 2015, making them partners in promoting the soda companies’ agendas.

Published in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine, the study found that 12 organizations accepted money from both companies, while one accepted funds from only Pepsi while 83 took money only from Coke. (The study authors were quick to point out that those numbers are likely skewed since Coca-Cola publishes a list of organizations it sponsors while Pepsi doesn’t.)

To what one hopes is their eternal and undying shame, two diabetes organizations even made the list of cola sponsorees: the American Diabetes Association and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation.

That’s like asking Greenpeace to take a check from a Japanese whaling concern--and having them accept.

The study authors were more mild in their judgment, saying that the link to diabetes orgs was “...surprising, given the established link between diabetes and soda consumption.”

We can only imagine the slick talkers who slithered out of the Pepsico and Coca-Cola nests to make their sleazy pitch for donating to these groups, and thus purchasing for themselves the fig leaf of demonstrating “concern” over diabetes. In these stingy times we can also imagine the arguments within those organizations about all the good they could do with their 30 pieces of silver.

But was it worth it? Again, according to the study authors, the companies “...used relationships with health organizations to develop positive associations for their brands,” and to “...neutralize any potential legislative opposition.”


One example that came up was that of the organization Save the Children. This group had had advocated for soda taxes as far back as the early 2000s, lobbying for what has since proven to be an effective way to reduce soda consumption radically.

Save the Children’s position mysteriously changed, however, in 2009 when the organization suddenly decided to drop that stance.

That was the year they also happened to receive more than $5 million from Coca-Cola and Pepsi.

Quelle coincidence.

But there’s a phrase that nicely fits this new era of the Bullshitocene: Money Talks, Bullshit Walks.

The only trouble is that while it is walking all over you and your health, it is also pulling the wool over your eyes.
###