And You Thought Glyphosate Was Bad: Big Agrichem
Companies Using Quasi-Slave Labor
By Kurtis Bright
Near-Slave Conditions Exist in the U.S. For Migrant Workers
At Big Agrichem Facilities
It’s difficult to overstate the length and breadth of the
list of complaints against Monsanto and others in big agrichem.
Naturally (unnaturally, actually) there are the engineered
seeds, perversely designed to not self-reproduce, thus locking farmers into a
vicious cycle of indebtedness.
Then of course there are the chemicals, the cancer-causing
glyphosate with which they have dusted nearly the entire earth in their
stultifying, poisonous embrace, with over 8.6 billion kilograms (18 billion
pounds) of the stuff having been sprayed in the U.S. alone.
And then there are the as-yet unknown dangers of feeding
humans and animals genetically modified foods, research for which is constantly
harried and hampered by government and industry.
But it gets even worse than that. How, you may well ask? How
bad could it get?
How about slave labor bad?
New reports are emerging that name Monsanto and other big
agriculture giants as being behind the horrific conditions in which they and
their subsidiaries force migrant laborers to work and live--on U.S. soil.
Thousands of workers labor under conditions that, according
to reports are akin to modern-day slavery at camps all across the Land of the
Free. Makes you wonder just what that phrase really means: free for whom?
According to an expose in the journal In These Times,
state inspectors are routinely summoned to deal with complaints about such
camps. And they end up writing citations a shocking 60 percent of the time they
are called out.
Which is all well and good. But there’s another problem when
it comes to Big Agrichem: it’s too big to jail.
Companies like Monsanto, Bayer, BASF, Syngenta and others
have woven such a powerful network of enablers among lazy and compliant
lawmakers and regulators that even these limp warnings and demands that they
comply with the law are tossed aside contemptuously.
These companies have also perfected the art of plausible
deniability and distancing themselves from operations from which they profit.
They hire intermediaries, third-party recruiters and “independent” landlords
who are paid to run the facilities, allowing Monsanto and DuPont to pretend
ignorance when it comes to mistreatment of workers.
But now the details of the travails of these migrant
laborers under the dubious care of the Big Ag companies has come to light,
painting a disturbing picture--and it was told in the words of the very workers
who have been so mistreated.
According to In These Times, one migrant worker,
50-year-old Baltazar Arvizu said, “I’ve stayed in housing that is very similar to
barns for animals. We used to live 80 in a barn. We just had two bathrooms
for 80 people.”
And Arzivu’s story took place not in some sketchy border
town. This is happening, right now, in modern-day Indiana. This isn’t some long
ago Dust Bowl land of Tom Joad.
But the ringing echoes of The Grapes of Wrath rings
throughout the stories these workers tell, even some 80 years after the Great
Depression ended and labor laws were supposedly reformed.
Worker complain they are being paid less than minimum wage, and
they are often forced to plunk down $300 monthly rent or more on
company-provided housing in shoddy motels and disused nursing homes.
The kitchen facilities the workers were promised in one of
these housing units turned out to be a converted school bus with a couple of
stoves and refrigerators and no ventilation, a shabby makeshift kitchen meant
to serve over 30 people.
The entire article is linked here, if you can stomach it.
And the next time some troll wants to tell you how Monsanto
and others like them are actually working to feed the world’s poor, send them a
copy.
###
No comments:
Post a Comment